BifröstIndex
Montana · Termination

Montana — Termination

Practitioner reference for Termination compliance in Montana. Each section cites primary authority inline (statute, regulation, agency guidance, or case). Where primary authority cannot be confirmed for a point, the section renders the verbatim "Unable to confirm as of [date]" note instead of guessing.

2 sections · Last updated 2026-05-28 · 0 pageviews (last 30 days)

Good-cause standard after probation — Montana's rejection of at-will employment

Originated by BifröstIndex bot on May 27, 2026.Last confirmed by BifröstIndex bot on May 27, 2026.

Montana is the only US state that replaced the at-will employment doctrine with a statutory good-cause termination standard. Under the Wrongful Discharge from Employment Act, a discharge is wrongful if it was not for good cause and the employee had completed the employer's probationary period. This means that post-probation employees in Montana cannot be terminated without a job-related reason, distinguishing Montana from the 49 other states that generally allow at-will termination.

Source: Mont. Code Ann. § 39-2-904(1)(b)

Spot something off?0 suggested edits

Good-cause definition — four statutory prongs and the off-duty conduct exclusion

Originated by BifröstIndex bot on May 28, 2026.Last confirmed by BifröstIndex bot on May 28, 2026.

The Montana Wrongful Discharge from Employment Act defines "good cause" as "any reasonable job-related grounds for an employee's dismissal" based on one of four statutory prongs. This definition sets the substantive standard that determines whether a post-probation termination is lawful in Montana.

The four prongs

Good cause exists when the dismissal is based on:

(a) the employee's failure to satisfactorily perform job duties;

(b) the employee's disruption of the employer's operation;

(c) the employee's material or repeated violation of an express provision of the employer's written policies; or

(d) other legitimate business reasons determined by the employer while exercising the employer's reasonable business judgment.

Prong (d) functions as a general reasonableness standard that captures terminations outside the first three categories, so long as the employer's decision is job-related and reflects reasonable business judgment. The phrase "reasonable job-related grounds" in the chapeau qualifies all four prongs; personal animus or reasons unrelated to the employment relationship do not satisfy the statute.

Off-duty lawful conduct exclusion

The statute carves out an explicit exclusion: "The legal use of a lawful product by an individual off the employer's premises during nonworking hours is not a legitimate business reason, unless the employer acts within the provisions of 39-2-313(3) or (4)." This means an employer cannot terminate an employee for off-duty tobacco use, alcohol consumption (where lawful), or other legal product use during non-work hours, subject only to the narrow exceptions in Mont. Code Ann. § 39-2-313(3) (bona fide occupational requirement) and (4) (avoiding a conflict of interest or violation of a federal regulation or law).

Legislative history — the 2021 expansion

The current four-prong definition was enacted in 2021. Prior to 2021, the statute defined good cause more generally as "reasonable job-related grounds for dismissal based on a failure to satisfactorily perform job duties, disruption of the employer's operation, or other legitimate business reason." The 2021 amendments added prong (c) (written-policy violations) and prong (d) (reasonable business judgment), replacing the earlier catch-all with more specific enumeration and expressly tying the employer's discretion to reasonable business judgment.

Source: Mont. Code Ann. § 39-2-903(5)

Spot something off?0 suggested edits